Pages

Monday, September 23, 2013

Why Rain Makes The Course Look So Good

I’ve been planning on writing a blog post for our membership with regards to the difference a good rainfall makes for the course. Last week I came across this blog post from a fellow Superintendent, Chris Tritabaugh from Hazeltine National Golf Club, about this exact topic and he has driven home all the crucial points that I also intended to. Chris is a very successful and greatly respected Superintendent in North America, which is why he was hired recently by Hazeltine as they prepare to host the 2016 Ryder Cup.

Our recent aeration has played a HUGE role in the improved condition of the course lately, but all the rainfall we've experienced recently has certainly made an impact in the noticeable "green-up" of the course, so there's no better time than now to share Chris' blog post.

Please take the time to read the following:

Why Rain Makes The Course Look So Good

Saturday night into Sunday morning the golf course, along with everyone's lawn, received one inch of much needed rain. Sunday morning when you got up and looked at your lawn, it was probably quite clear that the rain was appreciated by your turf. If you irrigate your lawn, you will have noticed it looking tired before the rain and almost immediately refreshed after the rain. We see the same thing on the golf course; after a long period without rain, even when using irrigation, the course begins to look a little tired.

Why is this?

Two reasons: 1. coverage, 2. water quality

Coverage is probably the most obvious reason irrigation cannot match rainfall. Golf course irrigation systems are designed, especially in the northern states, to supplement natural rainfall rather than replace it. The design of our system is very different than those in the Desert Southwest. Irrigation systems in the desert must provide nearly all water to a turf system. The cost to design and install an irrigation system able to almost fully compensate for a lack of rain, would not make sense in Minnesota, where irrigation is only needed for 8-12 weeks of the growing season. Coverage from rainfall is full, and not affected by outside agents, such as wind. Overheard irrigation can never provide perfect coverage.
hard water mineral deposits
Water Quality is the second and most important reason irrigation can never match rain. Almost everyone knows what happens when hard water dries on a surfaces. Its leaves behind mineral deposits, which are hard to remove. You have likely had your windshield spotted by a mis-aimed sprinkler, like the photo on the right. The water dries, and the water spots are almost impossible to remove. You will also notice that once it rains, those hard water spots on your windshield go away. Rain water is soft water; thus it is able to draw the minerals into a solution, leaving your windshield clean. Most people in this area have water-softeners in their home in order to remove the minerals that cause hard water deposits from building up on your dishes, shower and bath surfaces. It is no coincidence that water-softeners might have a corny name like, "Rain-soft, or Pure-as-Rain." Water softeners make hard water more like rain water.

Our irrigation water is quite hard and full of minerals. When we irrigate, the same minerals that cause hard water spots are left in our soil. The presence of these minerals lock up nutrients in the soil and make them unavailable to plants. Removing these hard water deposits is a nightmare on hard surfaces; the job usually requires some type of acid cleaner, not even elbow grease is enough to remove the deposits. Now imagine what it takes to get them out of the soil. When we get an inch of rain, after weeks with little to no rain, the rain, just as on the car windshield, acts as a solvent and pulls the minerals into a solution. With an inch of rain these minerals are pulled deep into the soil, away from the roots of our turf. This is why good drainage is important to good turf. Good drainage allows the rain water to carry these minerals away from the soil in which our turf is growing. In the case of our putting surfaces, the water drains through the sand, "flushes" out the drain tiles and the minerals are washed completely out of the soil system. With the minerals gone, many nutrients suddenly become available to the turf and the plants quickly "perk up", literally overnight.

While attaching a water softener to our irrigation system is not feasible; there are some things, we can do to help lessen the effect of hard water. Above I mentioned acid cleaners are often used for removing hard water spots. In our fertility program we use acid forming fertilizers, which help irrigation water to remove hard water minerals. Some courses are injecting various forms of acid into their irrigation water, in order to help soften the water. While this is not yet something we have done at Hazeltine, it is something we are exploring for next season. Another way in which we work to combat hard irrigation water is to employ deep/infrequent irrigation cycles. During a dry period, we will perform a "flush" on our putting surfaces. By "flushing" the soil system, even with hard irrigation water, we are able to remove some of the minerals left behind by irrigating. "Flushing" with irrigation water doesn't replace a good rainfall, but it gets us through dry periods without too much negative effect on our turf.

As you play the golf course this week, you will notice the turf looks less stressed and much "perkier." After an inch of rain, it is more than a coincidence.
 

Sunday, September 15, 2013

In Praise of Longer Grass

Yesterday I read what I believe to be a great article written by the editor of Golf Digest, Jerry Tarde.  I often think that our fairway HOC (height-of-cut) is too short resulting in very tight lies and making it even more difficult for the mid to high handicappers to hit from.  We mow them at .45".  The HOC of our "first-cut" of rough is .75" and seems to be the preferred landing area of many golfers.  We cut our rough lower this year than ever before, 1.5" throughout the season to be exact and the feedback from golfers has been very positive.

I think it's time to revisit our HOCs this winter and make some adjustments for next year as the majority of our golfers are not in lower handicap range.  That's just one example of how we can make our course a bit "easier" and certainly more enjoyable for the majority instead of continually conditioning it for the minority.  I think we can all agree that this game is hard enough as it is with the things that we cannot control so why not offer playing conditions that are more suitable for scoring.  Improved scoring = more enjoyment and yes, improved pace of play!

Okay, so here is the article that I was referring to.  Give it a quick read with an open mind and I assure you it will make a lot of sense...

In Praise Of Longer Grass
illustration by Ben Wiseman

The hardest shot in golf isn't the long bunker shot anymore.

The hardest shot in golf is any hybrid, iron or even wedge played from the middle of the fairway with a slightly downhill lie to an elevated green. It's so darn hard because the fairway is probably cut to linoleum height. Golfers struggle these days not so much with hitting it long or straight but with getting it airborne.

Today's tight lies conspire against that enjoyment. Closely mowed grass is easier for tour pros to play from but harder for average hackers like us. That's why I'm happy when my ball lands in the first cut of rough so I have a little cushion under my shot. Tight lies also diminish short-game shotmaking. We see more golfers putting from long distances off the green instead of playing artful wedges and run-ups.

I was making this case to Mike Davis, executive director of the United States Golf Association, just before the pros played Merion in June. Steve Smyers, an architect, had told me the fairway height at Merion for the 1971 Open was one inch. When I repeated that to Davis, he paused and said the planned fairway height for this year's Open was .26 inches. A couple of weeks later, Davis surprisingly reversed himself and announced Merion's fairway height at .45 inches.

"We had been trying to message about green speeds that they had just gotten too fast," Davis said, "and they cause agronomic and architectural problems. I actually think they cause nerve problems. It's why some people have gone to anchoring. And fairway height, again, it causes agronomic problems. The average golfer simply can't get the ball up, and they have trouble pitching it, too. So the reason we went to almost half an inch this year was me saying, 'Listen, I think it's the right statement for golf.' And we're going to do it again next year in the Open at Pinehurst."

The Stimpmeter was invented by Edward Stimpson in the 1930s as a device for measuring green speeds, but it was not adopted by the USGA until 1977, whereupon the USGA field staff was commissioned to measure 581 courses nationwide to benchmark the speed of American greens. Here is a sampling of what was found:
Cypress Point: 7 feet, 8 inches
Pebble Beach: 7-2
San Francisco Golf Club: 6-5
Augusta National: 7-11
Medinah: 7-8
Congressional: 6-4
Oakland Hills: 8-5
Pinehurst No. 2: 6-10
Pine Valley: 7-4
Winged Foot: 7-5
Shinnecock Hills: 7-2
Merion: 6-4
Harbour Town: 5-1
Oakmont: 9-8

These were America's finest courses, so one can surmise that the speed at average courses and munys in 1977 were more typically in the range of four to six feet. Managing director of the USGA Green Section Kimberly Erusha "ballpark estimates" today's greens at 9½ to 10 feet. I played Oakmont on a mid-summer day this year when speeds were a typical 13 to 14.

This recalls a long-ago conversation with Sir Michael Bonallack, who was then secretary of the R&A. I asked him if he was going to use the Stimpmeter at the British Open. And he said, "Why would I want to do that?" I said, to measure the greens' speed. And he said, "Why would I want to do that?" I said, well, I guess to ensure consistency from one green to the next. And he said, "Why would I want to do that? Isn't part of the challenge to golf to know how one hole plays differently from another?"

The bottom line is, every inch faster our greens have gotten requires more water, more money, more labor, more chemicals. And the real killer is, every inch slows down the pace of play. Fairway heights pose similar issues.

I applauded Kerry Haigh at the PGA Championship at Oak Hill this year when he refused to make public the green speeds. "To be honest, we don't think that's necessarily good for the overall country clubs out there," said the PGA's chief setup man.

Getting the USGA and the PGA of America speaking in unison against over-conditioning is the first step. Water shortages and tougher economics may do the rest. Change for the better is coming.